Get the latest VoIP Reviews, VoIP News and Insights for Business VoIP Users, VoIP Resellers and VoIP Manufacturers from leading VoIP authority Garrett Smith. Learn more about Smith.

AdTran 706 and 712 IP Phone First Look

Posted: January 28th, 2008 | Author: | Filed under: New VoIP Products | 2 Comments »

One of the things I always look forward to seeing at trade shows are the new products that I have not yet heard of. Last week at the Internet Telephony Expo, I was pleasantly surprised to see that AdTran had one display two new IP Phones that are set to hit the market in late February. For those of you who follow the VoIP hardware market closely, you know that AdTran had previously being using a brand version of the Polycom IP 301, IP 501 and IP 601 with their Netvanta IP PBX solution.

adtran ip phones

The new AdTran 706 and 712 IP Phones are really slick phones. Here are some feature highlights:

  • SIP Based
  • Platform independent
  • 6 lines and 12 lines respectively
  • Dual RJ45 Ports
  • Power over Ethernet Compatible
  • Full Duplex Speaker Phone
  • Large back-lit display
  • Wall mountable
  • Adjustable stand

The phones were so new that there were no data sheets, so I am simply recanting this from memory, but I can tell you that my overall impressions of the phones were these are definitely put together well enough to be a real competitor in the executive level IP phone space. AdTran is already working with IP PBX platform vendors to fully certify these phones, so unlike many late market entrants, these phones should work with any SIP based IP PBX. With MSRP’s of $249.99 and $299.9 respective, I would expect to see these phone on the street with prices in the $189 and $239 range, putting them in competition with their former OEM partner Polycom.


2 Comments on “AdTran 706 and 712 IP Phone First Look”

  1. 1 DevMan said at 9:33 am on January 29th, 2008:

    Just a quick correction, the model numbers on the phones are IP 706 and IP 712. Easy to tack on the extra digit with the 7000 series IP PBX.

  2. 2 Garrett Smith said at 10:42 am on January 29th, 2008:

    @DevMan:

    Thanks for the correction. I had thought I wrote down the part numbers wrong.

    There is a use for data sheets after all!

    Post updated.


Leave a Reply